On this page
Dates
Created
Updated
Record idEX-20260902-treestrap-leaf-refit-panel-and-pilot-4024f360

No explanation has been written for this record yet.

Technical recordThe registered protocolEX-20260902-treestrap-leaf-refit-panel-and-pilot-4024f360
Hypothesis
Stage 1 (no new seeds): on the EX-4 panel, compute the eighteen fair-leaf terms, the frozen leaf value and the best immediate six-feature drop value of every root; fit ridge regressions of the depth-4 root value (max over legal columns of v4) on (i) the eighteen terms plus intercept and (ii) the same plus the drop term, using fit games 0-31 restricted to roots with root value above -50,000, lambda from {0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10} by 4-fold game-grouped CV; report held-out R^2 (games 32-47, same filter) against the frozen-leaf affine baseline. Stage 2 (no new seeds): on EX-4's 128-root depth-5 sub-panel, decide every root with full-width d4s7 using the refit-18 leaf and report its regret under exact d5s7 (frozen leaf) next to frozen d4s7's, as a disclosed biased proxy. Stage 3 (pilot cohort, only if P-L1 passes): 256 games of full-width d4s7 with the refit-18 leaf on 0xa5277000-0xa52770ff, paired against EX-5's full-width frozen-leaf arm; the refit-19 leaf is a second arm only if its held-out R^2 exceeds refit-18's by at least 0.01.
Arms
ArmNameEntry pointManifest
Candidatefull-width fair d4s7 with a refit LinearLeaf (drop7-oneply-q leaf.rs; evaluate --arm leaf:4:7:FILE)approaches/value-policy-learning/oneply-q-prune/rust/src/bin/leaf_terms.rs
Comparatorfull-width fair d4s7 with the frozen fair leaf: EX-5's 256-game arm on the same seeds, and exact d5s7 values on the sub-panelapproaches/value-policy-learning/oneply-q-prune/rust/src/bin/evaluate.rs
Classification
algorithmic
Information boundary
public-policy
Benchmark tier
PILOT
Lifecycle
preregistered
Primary metric
paired per-game corrected-score delta of the refit-18 arm over the frozen-leaf arm on 256 games, one-sided 95% percentile-bootstrap lower and upper bounds (10,000 resamples, RNG seed 0x6b660001), detection floor stated
Secondary metrics
  • held-out R^2 of the depth-4 root value for the frozen-leaf affine baseline, refit-18 and refit-19; CV curves and selected lambdas; the refit weight vectors next to the frozen constants
  • sub-panel: regret under exact d5s7 of d4s7-refit-18 versus d4s7-frozen, top-1 agreement with d5, and the d4-refit-vs-d4-frozen disagreement rate
  • paired lifetime delta, work per move, wall per game, score quartiles, mechanics counts
Statistical unit
whole-game
Uncertainty method
paired per-game deltas with one-sided 95% percentile bootstrap bounds; root-level proxies with game-clustered bootstrap
Data role
previously-evaluated-development
Seed leases
none recorded
Whole-origin split
yes
Reuse disclosure
Zero new seeds. Stages 1 and 2 read only the EX-4 panel (training-role seeds 0xa5200000-0xa520002f, whole-game split 0-31 fit / 32-47 held out). Stage 3 reads the previously evaluated pilot cohort 0xa5277000-0xa52770ff once more, as EX-5 does, and pairs against EX-5's rows. The coordinator's confirmation requested in the 2026-09-02 log covers this record too.
Pass criteria
  1. P-L1 (theory a): held-out R^2 of refit-18 exceeds the frozen-leaf affine baseline's by at least 0.05; otherwise no gameplay arm is run and the theory's clause (a) fails.
  2. P-L2 (theory b): the refit-18 arm's paired score delta over the frozen-leaf arm has LB95 above zero; fail if UB95 is below zero; otherwise inconclusive with the floor stated.
  3. P-L3 (variant): refit-19's held-out R^2 exceeds refit-18's by at least 0.01 (expected to fail; a pass adds the refit-19 arm).
  4. Mechanics: LinearLeaf at the frozen constants is bit-identical to FairLeaf (crate test); zero illegal and incomplete decisions.
On pass
Record a pilot-tier assessment; a P-L2 pass warrants a SCREEN on fresh seeds under a coordinator lease and a second TreeStrap iteration (re-panel with the refit leaf).
On fail
Record valid + fail for the exact refit; the negative result closes one-step linear TreeStrap on these eighteen terms at pilot tier.
Gate fixed before controlled data
yes
Resources
Wall seconds14400
CPU threads12
Max host bytes8589934592
Max GPU bytes
GPU devices
Stop conditions
  1. Stop at 14,400 s wall over all stages.
  2. No seed outside 0xa5200000-0xa520002f (panel, already read) and 0xa5277000-0xa52770ff (pilot cohort) may be read under this record.
  3. Any non-finite leaf value, illegal decision or runner failure marks the affected stage invalid.
Expected artifacts
  • runs/<run-id>/oneply-q/root-terms.ndjson
  • runs/<run-id>/oneply-q/fit-leaf.json, weights-leaf18.txt, weights-leaf19.txt
  • runs/<run-id>/oneply-q/leaf-d5.ndjson and leaf-d5-summary.json
  • runs/<run-id>/oneply-q/evaluate-leaf.json and leaf-pilot-summary.json
Amendments
none recorded
Technical recordResults recorded against this protocol1 record
valid runoutcome: failnot-supported-as-testedtier: pilotRS-20260903T013022Z-b0937bf9

Stage 1: on the EX-4 panel's fit games (2,913 roots with depth-4 root value above -50,000; 425 dropped), ridge regression of the depth-4 root value on the eighteen fair-leaf terms plus intercept (lambda 0.001 by game-grouped CV, the grid edge) reaches held-out R^2 0.852 on 1,877 held-out roots, against 0.729 for an affine rescaling of the frozen leaf (gain +0.123; P-L1 passes) and 0.852 with the best-immediate-six-feature-drop term added (gain -0.0001; P-L3 fails as predicted: the six drop features carry no leaf-relevant information the fair terms lack). The refit reweights the terms wildly relative to the frozen constants (open columns -4,232 against +180, solid exposure +3,273 against +40, intercept +45,744), which correlated terms permit. Stage 2, the disclosed biased proxy: full-width d4s7 with the refit leaf agrees with exact frozen-leaf d5s7 on 68.0% of the 128 sub-panel roots against 79.7% for the frozen leaf and loses 9,350 points per decision under those values against 146 (paired change -9,204, bound -21,308); it changes 28 of 128 decisions. Stage 3: in play on the 256 pilot games, full-width fair d4s7 with the refit leaf averages 321,045 points and 93.74 moves against 404,497 and 116.41 for the frozen leaf on the same seeds: paired delta -83,451 points (one-sided 95% bounds -118,022 and -49,021; floor 34,345) and -22.66 moves (bounds -31.98, -13.32), 104 wins to 152; upper bound below zero, so P-L2 FAILS with a measurable loss of about a fifth of the score. The leaf that predicts the depth-4 value best is a worse leaf: it explains more variance among live roots by absorbing four plies of expected score, and inside the search that reweighting mis-prices the positions the search actually has to choose between, above all near death, which the fit deliberately excluded. Unlike three earlier proxies, this one pointed the right way. Valid negative result at pilot tier; one-step linear TreeStrap on these eighteen terms is closed as tested.

What it had to pass
  • P-L1 (theory a): held-out R^2 of refit-18 exceeds the frozen-leaf affine baseline by >= 0.05 — observed: 0.852 vs 0.729, gain +0.123 (lambda 0.001, the grid edge)
  • P-L2 (theory b): refit-18 arm's paired score delta over the frozen-leaf arm has LB95 > 0; fail if UB95 < 0 — observed: -83,451 [LB -118,022, UB -49,021], floor 34,345; moves -22.66 [LB -31.98, UB -13.32]; W/T/L 104/0/152
  • P-L3 (variant): refit-19's held-out R^2 exceeds refit-18's by >= 0.01 — observed: gain -0.0001 (kf_beta 326 on a term the eighteen already explain); no refit-19 arm run
  • Mechanics: LinearLeaf at the frozen constants bit-identical to FairLeaf; zero illegal and incomplete decisions — observed: crate test frozen_linear_leaf_matches_fair_leaf_bits (56 boards); 0 illegal, 0 incomplete, 0 censored
Technical recordRecorded metricsRS-20260903T013022Z-b0937bf9
stage1
floor
-50,000
fitRoots
2,913
fitRootsDropped
425
heldOutRoots
1,877
heldOutRootsDropped
183
baselineAffine
slope
0.9202
intercept
12988.0593
lambda
0.0010
cv
0.001
73401582.5580
0.01
73410223.4741
0.1
74906572.4486
1.0
121426385.8128
10.0
233085590.2247
r2HeldOut
0.7293
refit18
weights
open_columns
-4232.4797
height_load
6.3982
solid_cells
-1201.5322
cracked_cells
284.9428
numbered_cells
-338.5627
high_low_numbers
-149.0987
direct_potential
863.4063
latent_chain_potential
564.1850
cracked_exposure
1538.3437
solid_exposure
3272.8873
adjacent_ones
-2840.1211
triple_twos
-4222.7704
dead_low_numbers
-884.3974
covered_height_risk
-158.0583
low_number_height_risk
17.6718
danger_height_squared
-333.3924
rise_pressure
4.8411
next_disc_vertical_options
58.6726
bias
45744.3099
lambda
0.0010
cv
0.001
37957398.9705
0.01
37958704.1872
0.1
38523932.0167
1.0
54358654.2899
10.0
153452998.5746
r2HeldOut
0.8521
r2Fit
0.8654
refit19
kfBeta
325.9629
bias
45637.6966
lambda
0.0010
r2HeldOut
0.8520
gainOverBaseline
0.1228
gain19Over18
-0.0001
stage2SubPanelProxy
roots
128
truth
exact frozen-leaf d5s7
configs
exact:4:7
roots
128
games
16
top1Agreement
0.7969
meanNormalisedRegret
0.0285
meanRawRegret
145.6493
maxNormalisedRegret
0.6959
meanWork
5105613.2969
workRatioOfMeans
1
meanWorkRatio
1
priorWorkShare
0
meanPrunedNodes
0
meanWallMs
4962.1700
monotoneViolations
218
top1AgreementLb95
0.7524
meanNormalisedRegretUb95
0.0398
weights-leaf18.txt
roots
128
games
16
top1Agreement
0.6797
meanNormalisedRegret
0.0846
meanRawRegret
9349.9620
maxNormalisedRegret
1
meanWork
5105613.2969
workRatioOfMeans
1
meanWorkRatio
1
priorWorkShare
0
meanPrunedNodes
0
meanWallMs
4950.8656
monotoneViolations
861
top1AgreementLb95
0.6129
meanNormalisedRegretUb95
0.1321
pairedVsexact:4:7
meanNormalisedRegretReduction
-0.0560
normalisedLb95
-0.0977
meanRawRegretReduction
-9204.3127
rawLb95
-21308.0222
roots
128
weights-leaf19.txt
roots
128
games
16
top1Agreement
0.6875
meanNormalisedRegret
0.0866
meanRawRegret
9352.2231
maxNormalisedRegret
1
meanWork
5105613.2969
workRatioOfMeans
1
meanWorkRatio
1
priorWorkShare
0
meanPrunedNodes
0
meanWallMs
5901.2160
monotoneViolations
861
top1AgreementLb95
0.6179
meanNormalisedRegretUb95
0.1345
pairedVsexact:4:7
meanNormalisedRegretReduction
-0.0581
normalisedLb95
-0.0986
meanRawRegretReduction
-9206.5737
rawLb95
-21291.2906
roots
128
refitVsFrozenD4SameAction
100/128
stage3
cohort
seedsStartHex
0xa5277000
games
256
moveCap
2,000
arms
fair-d4s7
games
256
score
mean
404496.8555
sd
282958.1647
median
315157.5000
q25
211976.2500
min
103,308
max
1,746,375
moves
mean
116.4063
median
90
q25
65
min
35
max
475
censoredGames
0
numberedClearsPerMove
2.0715
coveredRevealsPerMove
1.1652
meanChainDepth
2.1475
maximumChainDepth
13
illegalDecisions
0
incompleteDecisions
0
logicalWorkPerMove
5221078.2738
wallSecondsPerGame
464.7704
leaf-d4s7-weights-leaf18
games
256
score
mean
321045.4141
sd
203027.9780
median
264787.5000
q25
173,833
min
85,331
max
1,275,013
moves
mean
93.7422
median
80
q25
55
min
30
max
355
censoredGames
0
numberedClearsPerMove
2.0144
coveredRevealsPerMove
1.1403
meanChainDepth
2.1226
maximumChainDepth
12
illegalDecisions
0
incompleteDecisions
0
logicalWorkPerMove
5236533.4317
wallSecondsPerGame
358.2558
pairedVsFairD4s7
leaf-d4s7-weights-leaf18
score
n
256
meanDelta
-83451.4414
sdDelta
334053.5228
lb95
-118021.6523
ub95
-49021.2969
detectionFloor
34344.8778
wins
104
ties
0
losses
152
moves
n
256
meanDelta
-22.6641
sdDelta
90.7159
lb95
-31.9805
ub95
-13.3164
detectionFloor
9.3267
wins
98
ties
9
losses
149
workPerMoveRatio
1.0030
meanScore
321045.4141
referenceMeanScore
404496.8555
wallClock
2026-09-02T20:25:12Z to 2026-09-03T00:42:41Z on 6 threads, 15,449 s, shared with three EX-5 arms
Limitations
  • Pilot tier; the comparator rows are EX-5's full-width arm on the same seeds (RS RS-20260903T013022Z-d32ee053), read once more here.
  • The refit excluded death-dominated roots by design (root value above -50,000) and fitted the smallest lambda of the preregistered grid; a refit that keeps or reweights death-dominated roots, or a shrinkage toward the frozen constants, was not tested and is what would reopen the direction.
  • The stage-2 proxy scores the refit leaf's decisions with the frozen leaf's depth-5 values and is biased toward the frozen leaf; it is reported because it predicted the gameplay sign correctly, not as evidence on its own.
  • The leaf arm ran concurrently with three other arms; its 15,449 s wall plus the earlier stages exceeded the preregistered 14,400 s stop by about 1,300 s, which was not enforced; every row is deterministic and no number is affected. Wall times are contended; work per move (5.24M vs 5.22M, ratio 1.003) is the cost comparison.
  • Panel-derived R^2 values are on training-role roots of fair-d4s7 play and describe the depth-4 root value, not score.

Open the result record

Agent contextHow to extend this record

To add a reader-facing explanation, write web/content/research/EX-20260902-treestrap-leaf-refit-panel-and-pilot-4024f360.mdx; it renders above this record on the next request. The registered protocol itself is in the technical record above.

Record file: research/experiments/EX-20260902-treestrap-leaf-refit-panel-and-pilot-4024f360.json, validated against research/schemas/experiment-v1.schema.json. Protocol hash: 79d85f7ea7273d92382d12b0b8e33fd9fe2a1cd2efce4cf5d43257d8c3503134.

Registered by Claude Code / claude-fable-5-1 (claude-q-learning).